Posts Tagged ‘bay health’

Toxic Algae Bloom Identified in Mattawoman Creek

Friday, August 15th, 2008

Toxic Algae Bloom Identified in POTOMAC RIVER TRIBUTARY, MATTAWOMAN CREEK

Dept. of Natural Resources Asks Potomac Watershed Residents For Help to Prevent Future Harmful Algal Blooms

Routine water quality monitoring by the Maryland Department of Natural Resources and the Morgan State University Estuarine Research Center recently identified high concentrations of toxic blue-green algae, Microcystis, in Mattawoman Creek off of the Potomac River.

“Excessive nutrient pollution in the water fuels these algal blooms, which are not uncommon in the freshwater and low salinity waters of the Potomac River.  Harmful algal blooms such as these can be prevented if more people living in the Potomac River watershed take steps to reduce run-off pollution,” said Tom Parham, DNR tidewater ecosystem assessment director. “Some easy and affordable backyard solutions include planting native trees and rain gardens, using rain barrels, and refraining from fertilizing in the spring.”

After learning of algal toxin levels higher than typical acceptable standards for human and animal contact in water samples from Mattawoman Creek, Charles County issued a health advisory for the area encouraging people to take precautions to reduce the risk of illness or discomfort related to blue-green algal blooms:

* The public should not swim in areas where a blue-green algae bloom is evident.

* Do not drink water from any area with the appearance of a blue-green algae bloom.

* If contact is made with problem water, simply wash off with fresh water.

* In some cases, skin irritations may occur after prolonged contact. If irritations persist, see a physician or local health care provider.

* Keep pets and livestock away from bloom areas.

* Blue-green algal blooms may contain toxins that could be harmful or fatal to pets and livestock.

* Do not eat internal organs of fish caught in blue-green bloom waters.

* Inhalation exposure to blue-green algal bloom waters may result in irritation of the eyes, ears, nose and throat with extended recreational activity on such waterways.

Please note that illness associated with harmful algal blooms is a reportable illness and physicians should be reporting these to local health departments.

“We will continue to monitor the algal bloom,” added Parham.

For up to date information on all of Maryland’s harmful algal blooms and water quality, please visit DNR’s Eyes on the Bay website at www.eyesonthebay.net.

Chesapeake Bay Homeowners Get Best Practices for Home, Garden and Lawn

Friday, May 2nd, 2008

A new website shares examples of best management practices that farmers use to produce healthy crops and protect water quality in the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries. Homeowners can apply these same conservation measures to home, lawn, and garden projects.

In response the the program. Governor Martin O’Malley remarked: “Farmers like homeowners and all residents of the Chesapeake Bay watershed play an important role in protecting our soil and water resources. “It is a priority of the O’Malley-Brown Administration to protect the health of the Bay for all to enjoy and to strengthen the family farms that anchor our rural communities and economies, preserve open productive land, and provide a local source of food. Farmers are strong partners in conservation.”

The project was constructed through a Maryland Agricultural Education and Rural Development Assistance Fund grant from the Rural Maryland Council.

For details see: http://www.iwantmarylandsbest.com/

Chesapeake Bay Grasses Have Increased by 10 Percent

Monday, April 28th, 2008

Underwater bay grasses covered nearly 65,000 acres of the Chesapeake Bay and its tidal rivers in 2007, about 35 percent of the 185,000-acre baywide restoration goal, according to data from scientists with the Chesapeake Bay Program. Though a 10 percent increase from 59,000 acres in 2006, bay grasses have not yet recovered to the recent high of 90,000 acres in 2002.

Bay grasses — also called submerged aquatic vegetation or SAV — are critical to the Bay ecosystem because they provide habitat and nursery grounds for fish and blue crabs, trap sediments, absorb excess nutrients and reduce shoreline erosion. Bay grasses are also an excellent measure of the Bay’s overall condition because they are not under harvest pressure and their health is closely linked to water quality.

“While we saw a slight increase in SAV baywide in 2007 — due in part to increases in the very large and dense beds in the upper Bay and upper Potomac River — overall there is concern about SAV in many areas because of declining water clarity,” said Bob Orth, scientist with the Virginia Institute of Marine Science and leader of the SAV baywide annual survey.

In the upper Bay zone (from the Chesapeake Bay Bridge north), bay grasses covered about 19,000 acres, 80 percent of the 23,630-acre goal and an increase from about 15,500 acres in 2006. The massive grass bed on the Susquehanna Flats, which is now visible on satellite images, dominated this zone. Bay grasses in the Flats increased from 8,743 acres in 2006 to 11,726 acres in 2007, 97 percent of the restoration goal for that segment. However, much of the rest of the upper Bay zone had little grasses, particularly on the Eastern Shore from the Sassafras River to the Chester River.

In the middle Bay zone (from the Chesapeake Bay Bridge to the Potomac River), bay grass acreage decreased slightly to about 30,000 acres, 26 percent of the 115,229-acre restoration goal. Grass beds remained reasonably robust in the Severn, upper Patuxent and upper Potomac rivers. Bay grasses in the upper Potomac River increased from 4,234 acres in 2006 to 6,246 acres in 2007, exceeding Maryland and Virginia’s restoration goals for that area. However, grasses in the lower central Bay in Virginia decreased from 2,017 acres in 2006 to 1,342 acres in 2007.

Unusually high salinities due to dry conditions during summer 2007 may have contributed to declines in the Chester and Magothy rivers and in Eastern Bay, where bay grass acreage fell from 565 acres in 2006 to 80 acres in 2007. Low river flows during drought conditions allow saltier waters to move up from the Atlantic, negatively impacting certain bay grass species that are adapted to growing in fresher waters.

In the lower Bay zone (from the Potomac River south), researchers mapped about 16,000 acres of grasses — an increase from a record low of 13,000 acres in 2006 and 35 percent of the 46,030-acre restoration goal. Many beds dominated by eelgrass, which dramatically died back during the hot summer of 2005, showed some modest recovery in 2007. Grass beds in the eastern lower Bay, for example, increased from 3,740 acres in 2006 to 5,134 acres in 2007 — still far short of the 15,107-acre goal for this segment.

“The overall picture for eelgrass — one of the two dominant SAV species in the lower Bay zone — remains bleak due to multiple stressors, including declining water clarity, warmer summertime temperatures and cownose rays,” said Orth.

Bay grasses continue to show a strong presence in many of the low-salinity and freshwater areas in the lower Bay zone, such as the Mattaponi, Pamunkey and Chickahominy rivers and creeks off the upper mainstem James River. These tributary segments are far enough from the Bay that the drought did not raise their salinity enough to cause diebacks of the low-salinity grass species that grow there.

“Over the past five to 10 years we have witnessed large increases of SAV in many of the freshwater tributaries and segments of the Bay,” said Lee Karrh, scientist with the Maryland Department of Natural Resources and chair of the Bay Program’s SAV Workgroup. “However, middle- and high-salinity areas, such as Eastern Bay and Tangier Sound, are well below their peaks.”

Because of their importance to the Bay ecosystem, in 2003 Bay Program partners committed to protect and restore 185,000 acres of bay grasses by 2010.

Annual bay grass acreage estimates are an indication of the Bay’s response to pollution control efforts, such as implementation of agricultural best management practices (BMPs) and upgrades to wastewater treatment plants. Bay watershed residents can do their part to help bay grasses by reducing their use of lawn fertilizers, which contribute excess nutrients to local waterways and the Bay, and participating with their local tributary teams or watershed organizations.

Bay managers are supplementing pollution reduction efforts with experimental bay grass plantings where predicted improvements in water quality would support bay grasses where none currently exist. These newly planted grasses act as seed sources which, in turn, produce more grass beds as water quality improves.

Bay grasses acreage is estimated through an aerial survey, which is flown from late spring to early fall. For additional information about the aerial survey and survey results, go to www.vims.edu/bio/sav/.

source: MD DNR press release

Governor Martin O’Malley Signs Chesapeake Bay Environmental Health Bill

Friday, April 25th, 2008

On April 24, 2008, Governor Martin O’Malley joined Senate President Thomas V. Mike Miller Jr., House Speaker Michael E. Busch, Lieutenant Governor Anthony G. Brown, to sign legislation to protect Maryland’s environment and the health of the Chesapeake Bay, and help secure Maryland’s energy future.

“We must do all that we can to preserve our natural resources and secure Maryland’s energy future,” said Governor Martin O’Malley. “I want to thank the General Assembly in working together this session to pass legislation that continues to make Maryland a national leader in protecting the environment. With today’s bills, we are creating a sustainable energy policy, securing relief for thousands of Maryland ratepayers through a global settlement with Constellation energy, protecting our environment and helping to restore the Chesapeake Bay for future generations.”

“Maryland ratepayers will see over one billion in liability relief as a result of the hard work during the 2008 legislative session,” said Speaker Michael E. Busch. “The legislation that we are signing today is good for the environment, good for the economy and good for the consumer: protecting the Chesapeake Bay, promoting green technology and reducing energy consumption.”

Governor O’Malley signed into law legislation that updates and strengthens Maryland’s critical areas law to ensure more adequate protection of the most environmentally sensitive and significant lands within Maryland’s Chesapeake and Coastal Bays watersheds.  The Critical Areas law will restore the Critical Area Commission’s regulatory authority to operate with the same authority as every other agency of State government; significantly strengthen enforcement; provide stronger protection of water quality and wildlife habitats; establish new procedures for processing variances; and require updating of the Critical Area boundary — which has not been adjusted since 1972.  The 1984 critical areas law designated all land within 1,000 feet of the edge of tidal waters and wetlands as “critical area.”  Sixty-four local jurisdictions including 16 counties and 48 municipalities comprise land within the critical area.

“Governor O’Malley continues to showcase the leadership that will save our Bay and make our growth sustainable for future generations, “said Lt. Governor Anthony Brown.  “The legislation being signed today will serve as a national example of what states can do to improve the health and sustainability of our environment.”

Among the bills signed today was legislation that secures a nearly $2 billion global settlement with Constellation Energy Group for Maryland ratepayers and families and ends Maryland ratepayers’ obligations for decommissioning nuclear power facilities at Calvert Cliffs, saving Maryland ratepayers $1.5 billion in future costs.  Ratepayers were projected to begin payments of $33 million annually from 2016 through 2036.  As a result of this settlement, Constellation Energy Group will be liable for these costs.  Under the terms of the agreement, Baltimore Gas & Electric residential ratepayers will receive a one-time “rate rebate” of approximately $170 by the end of the year.  This refund amounts to $187 million in rate relief for Maryland’s families and represents a more than 10% reduction in this year’s total bill for more than 50% of all BGE customers – over 580,000 ratepayers.

“Today is a big win for the Governor. He delivered on his promise to the BGE ratepayers and he has laid the groundwork for years of future savings for all citizens through energy efficiency. No one state Governor can stop global energy prices from going up,” said Senate President Thomas V. Mike Miller, Jr. “But Governor O’Malley has done more than any of us thought was possible. I was very pleased that he accomplished all of this while also making great strides in protecting and restoring the Chesapeake Bay.”

In addition, Governor O’Malley signed into law legislation that helps secure our energy future including bills that:

Establish the Maryland Strategic Energy Investment Fund and the Maryland Strategic Investment Program to promote affordable, reliable, and clean energy;

Invest in sustainable energy by increasing the percentage of requirements of the Renwable Energy Portfolio Standard (RPS) to 20% in 2022 and beyond;

Encourages Marylanders to invest in clean energy systems for their homes by increasing specified grant limits under the Solar Energy and Geothermal Heat Pump grant programs, and creating tax incentives for solar energy geothermal equipment, etc.;

Establishes green building standards for new and renovated State buildings and new school buildings;

Establishes the State goal of achieving a 15% reduction in per capita electricity consumption and peak demand by the end of 2015 through the EmPOWER Maryland Energy Efficiency initiative.

DNR Announces 2008 Chesapeake Bay Blue Crab Regulations

Tuesday, April 22nd, 2008

On April 21, 2008, the Maryland Department of Natural Resources (DNR) proposed new recreational and commercial harvest regulations to help rebuild the Chesapeake Bay blue crab population and fishery. The proposed regulations are designed to reduce female blue crab harvest by 34 percent in 2008.

“We must take action today to ensure that Maryland’s iconic blue crab and the economy it supports continue to be important parts of our culture for generations to come,” said Governor Martin O’Malley. “The historic cooperation and coordination between Maryland, Virginia and the Potomac River Fisheries Commission has created an unparalleled opportunity to protect and restore our shared blue crab resource.  By working together, we will protect the most biologically important blue crabs from the beginning of their migration until they spawn in late spring and summer.”

The proposed emergency regulations for the 2008 Chesapeake Bay commercial blue crab fishery include an early closure to the season for harvesting female crabs and catch limits on female crabs earlier in the fall.  DNR’s preferred regulatory option being introduced as an emergency regulatory package today, would close commercial harvest of female crabs on October 23 and impose individualized catch limits effective September 1 based on a waterman’s recent annual average reported female blue crab harvest.  The proposed emergency regulations for the 2008 Chesapeake Bay recreational fishery prohibit any female blue crab harvest.

Protecting female blue crabs by reducing recreational and commercial harvests represents the best opportunity for the quickest rebound,” said DNR Secretary John R. Griffin.  “We will continue to work with scientists, recreational crabbers, the commercial crab industry, conservationists, and local businesses to ensure a sustainable future for our blue crabs so that the species can continue to fulfill its ecological role within the Bay while also supporting the local economies that rely upon it.”

The current abundance of adult or reproductive-age blue crabs is 120 million crabs, only slightly above the established minimum safe threshold of 86 million reproductive-age crabs, is 70 percent lower than 1990 levels and well below the conservation target of 200 million crabs.  Since 2001, Maryland and Virginia have shared a conservation goal of limiting annual blue crab harvest to no more than 46 percent of the species population.  Scientists estimate that more than 60 percent of the Bay’s adult crab population was harvested last year.  In Maryland, the 2007 commercial blue crab harvest of approximately 21.8 million pounds was one of the lowest recorded since 1945.

Governor O’Malley has committed to working closely with Maryland’s blue crab industry to develop mitigation options for the potential short term economic impacts resulting from the proposed regulations. The fiscal year 2009 capital budget for DNR included $3 million for habitat restoration projects, seafood processing industry grants and aquaculture development.

More than 500 individual comments have been submitted on blue crab management to the DNR since it initiated a public comment process in February. DNR’s public comment process thus far has included nine public and Sport and Tidal Fish Advisory Commissions meetings and an on-going online comment process. The proposed draft regulations will be reviewed by the Maryland General Assembly’s Joint Committee on Administrative, Executive & Legislative Review. The proposed regulations will be published in the Maryland Register on May 23, 2008.

DNR will hold two public hearings on the regulatory proposal – one on May 7 at 6:30 p.m. at Governor’s Hall at Sailwinds Park in Cambridge, and one on June 4 at 7 p.m. at Calvary United Methodist Church in Annapolis.  Sign language interpreters and other appropriate accommodations for individuals will be provided upon request.  Public comments may also be submitted via mail to Sarah Widman, Fisheries Service, B-2, Tawes State Office Building, 580 Taylor Avenue, Annapolis, Maryland 21401, by calling 410-260-8260, by faxing to 410-260-8278 or emailing to fisheriespubliccomment@dnr.state.md.us.

A variety of factors including over-fishing, poor water quality, loss of habitat such as submerged aquatic vegetation and oyster reefs, and changing climatic conditions have contributed to the decline of the Bay’s blue crab population.  Reducing female blue crab harvest is one of many actions taken by the O’Malley Administration to help restore the Chesapeake Bay ecosystem.  Recent successes include strengthening the Critical Area Law to protect the most sensitive and significant shoreline habitats; securing an additional $25 million annually for Bay restoration efforts through the Chesapeake Bay 2010 Trust Fund; and implementing the BayStat Initiative to track progress and more effectively target our efforts.

New Chesapeake Bay Environmental Study Vessel to be Christened at NorthBay Adventure Camp in Maryland

Tuesday, April 22nd, 2008

“R/V Miss Nancy” Will be Used by Middle School Students for Authentic Bay Investigations.

The christening of the “R/V Miss Nancy,” a 48-foot-long vessel that will be used by NorthBay Adventure Camp in North East, Md., to take classes of students out on the Chesapeake Bay where they will conduct authentic science investigations related to environmental restoration. The vessel will play a key role in NorthBay’s mission of changing children’s lives. The “R/V Miss Nancy” expands NorthBay’s commitment to giving students opportunities to participate authentic science investigations and get them reconnected to the natural world. NorthBay is now operating a full school year program, which makes the Christening of the “R/V Miss Nancy” a next logical expansion component. NorthBay’s mission is to challenge middle school students to realize that their attitudes and actions have a lasting impact on their future, the environment and the people around them by using approved Maryland Department of Education curriculum and the outdoors as an integrating context.

The ceremony occurs on Thursday, April 24, 2008, at 5:30 p.m., at NorthBay, 11 Horseshoe Point Lane, Northeast, MD 21901. John Erickson, chairman and CEO of Erickson Retirement Communities, and his wife Nancy – for whom the vessel is named – will officiate at the christening ceremony. Faculty from George Mason University who are conducting research at NorthBay on the use of technology to aid in connecting students to the environment will be present for the ceremony, as will Baltimore City Public Schools children. The research project will be conducted using Baltimore City Public School students piloting a 20-pound remote-controlled submarine. R/V MISS NANCY is a 48′ x 14′ twin 115hp vessel that has been USCG inspected for 49 (Seating for 44).

NorthBay was established in 2005 by The Erickson Foundation to establish educational opportunities for young people. Through its partnerships with the Maryland Department of Natural Resources and the Maryland Department of Education, NorthBay hosts more than 10,000 middle school students each year. With a full-time staff of more than 100 professionals, NorthBay uses experiential education to instill confidence, knowledge, and leadership in young people and teach them that their actions have a lasting impact on the future. NorthBay is located on more than 97 acres at the confluence of the Chesapeake Bay and Susquehanna River in Cecil County, Md.

Governor O’Malley Outlines Initiatives to Restore Health of Chesapeake Bay

Monday, March 3rd, 2008

Environmental Agenda “Most Forward Thinking in Last 20 Years”

On March 3rd, 2008, Governor Martin O’Malley outlined new initiatives to begin restoring the health of the Chesapeake Bay, and the need for a strengthened critical area law.  Standing on the beach in front of the Phillip Merrill Environmental Center in Annapolis, Governor O’Malley was joined by Kim Coble, Maryland Executive Director of the Chesapeake Bay Foundation and Brad Heavner, State Director of Environment Maryland, among other business, community, and environmental leaders.

“We all recognize that the health of our Bay is at critical crossroads.  In its annual report last year, the Chesapeake Bay Foundation gave the health of the Bay a score of 28 out of 100.  Over the last five years before that the average score was 27,” said Governor O’Malley.  “As One Maryland, we have a choice.  We can continue with the status quo and hope that the health of the Bay begins to improve, or we can take action to strengthen our critical area laws and improve the health of our Bay.”

“The state’s Critical Area Act is a law with the right intention but it has not kept pace with development and is clearly broken. We thank Governor O’Malley for providing the leadership to fix it,” said Ms. Coble. “We also want to acknowledge Governor O’Malley’s environmental agenda this year. Critical Area reform, Energy Efficiency, the Bay Trust Fund, and the Global Warming Solutions Act, together create the most forward thinking agenda we have seen in the last 20 years.”

Governor O’Malley has introduced Senate Bill 844 and House Bill 1253 to update and strengthen Maryland’s critical areas law to ensure more adequate protection of the most environmentally sensitive and significant lands within Maryland’s Chesapeake and Coastal Bays watersheds. The proposed legislation would:

* Restore the Critical Area Commission’s regulatory authority to operate with the same authority as every other agency of State government;
* Significantly strengthen enforcement;
* Provide stronger protection of water quality and wildlife habitats;
* Establish new procedures for processing variances; and
* Require updating of the Critical Area boundary — which has not been adjusted since 1972.

The 1984 critical areas law designated all land within 1,000 feet of the edge of tidal waters and wetlands as “critical area.”  The current 1,000-foot area was identified using 1972 state wetland maps, that are still used today for enforcement and variance allowances by local governments.  Sixty-four local jurisdictions including 16 counties and 48 municipalities comprise land within the critical area.

To prevent houses from being built near the water, the newly updated law will require a 300 foot setback for all new subdivisions in the RCA (Resource Conservation Area) and will require the Critical Area Commission to consider Smart Growth Standards for new growth allocations.  The legislation would also require builders and home improvement contractors to comply with the Critical Area law, and require anyone who builds an illegal structure in the Critical Area to relocate it.

“We need to get serious about protecting the Bay and fix the laws that are good in theory but poor in practice,” said Mr. Heavner.  “The Governor is showing strong leadership on this issue, and I hope legislators are equally up to the task.”

In addition to the Critical Areas law, Governor O’Malley has proposed legislation that would implement the Chesapeake Bay 2010 Trust Fund and permit the State to aggressively promote transit-oriented development (TOD) as a smart growth tool to revitalize communities and curb sprawl.

In the last year, Governor O’Malley has taken a number of actions to help protect the environment and restore the health of the Chesapeake Bay, including:

* Created the Chesapeake Bay 2010 Trust Fund to help restore the health of the Chesapeake Bay;
* Led efforts to improve the Chesapeake Bay, signing laws to improve stormwater management and require phosphorus-free detergent, and accepting regional Forest Conservation Agreement;
* Established BayStat to coordinate public, private, non-profit efforts to save the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries;
* Created the Climate Change Commission to develop an action plan to address climate change in Maryland and rising sea levels in the Chesapeake Bay;
* Fought for and signed into law the Clean Cars law to clean our air;
* Launched the EmPOWER Maryland Initiative, setting the most ambitious goal in the nation to decrease per capita energy consumption 15% by 2015;
* Fought sprawl and traffic by blocking the massive Four Seasons development on the Bay, fully funding Program Open Space and restoring Maryland’s leadership in Smart Growth;
* Joined the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, working with 9 other states to reduce emissions and fight global warming;
* Boosted renewable energy with a law making solar energy more affordable, and the Clean Energy Schools initiative to put solar panels on schools;
* Helped farmers protect the land by keeping farming profitable, investing a record $8 million in cover crop programs and tripled annual budget for MARBIDCO and agricultural innovation; and
* Passed the Oyster Restoration Act to restore oyster population of the Bay.

Chesapeake Bay Oysters

Sunday, February 17th, 2008

Introduction

A vital inhabitant of the Chesapeake Bay is the Virginia oyster (Crassostrea Virginica),
also known as Eastern or Atlantic oysters. The oyster is designated as the state
shell of Virginia.

The decline of oysters in the bay is an issue that has generated an enormous
interest from a variety of groups. Commercial harvests of Chesapeake Bay oysters
have been carried out for over a century, reaching 4 million bushels annually in
the 1920’s and continuing at rates that often exceeded 1 million bushels until
oyster populations crashed in the 1980’s. Two diseases, MSX and dermo decimated
bay oysters, contributing to their decline. Current oyster counts are said to be
less than 1 percent of historical levels.

Oyster Restoration

In September of 2007, Maryland announced the formation of Maryland’s new
Oyster Advisory Commission (OAC). The 21-member commission’s goals include
developing new strategies for rebuilding and managing the Chesapeake Bay’s
oyster population. The OAC consists of scientists, watermen, anglers,
businessmen, economists, environmental advocates and elected officials,
appointed by the Maryland Department of Natural Resources (DNR).

Oyster Aquaculture

The Chesapeake Bay supports a successful oyster aquaculture industry. Small
oyster aquaculture operations once consisted of areas of private property or
leased beds where watermen maintained oyster bars which encouraged new oysters
to colonize and grow. More recent aquaculture goes a step further to include
seeded oysters that are grown in cages or bags to protect the oysters from
damage.

Virginia Marine Resources Commission regulates oyster aquaculture in the
Virginia portion of the Chesapeake Bay. Restrictions prevent oyster aquaculture
operations from infringing on private docks or waterfront properties.

Chesapeake Bay Oyster Cuisine

Oysters are prepared in many ways including single fried, oyster fritters,
steamed oysters, oyster stuffing, oyster stew and even raw on the half shell.
Despite the decreased harvests, Chesapeake Bay oysters are available in the
shell or shucked and oysters are on the menu of almost every restaurant on the
region. Oysters are a good source of Protein, Vitamin C, Thiamin, Niacin,
Magnesium, and Phosphorus. They also contain Vitamin B12, Iron, Zinc, Copper,
Manganese, and Selenium.

Virginia Aquaculture Technical Advisory Committee Spring 2008 Meetings

Saturday, February 16th, 2008

The Aquaculture Technical Advisory Committee will meet from 10 a.m. to 3 p.m. on the following dates

March 18, 2008

Northampton County Former Circuit Court Room
16404 Courthouse Road
Eastville, VA 23347

April 24, 2008

Shore Bank Headquarters
25020 Shore Parkway, Onley, VA 23418

Dailypress.com Blasts Virginia Marine Resources Commission Record

Friday, February 15th, 2008

A recent dailypress.com article sharply criticizes the Virginia Marine Resources Commission, calling for sweeping changes of the organization.

The article states:  “Step back and face these facts. Treating Virginia’s marine resources as strictly commercial assets, and allowing them to be plundered, hasn’t worked well. Not for commercial interests, not for the rest of Virginia.”

At the center of the issue are 2 key Chesapeake Bay inhabitants - crabs and oysters.

The commentary notes that “The VMRC and its predecessor agencies have been regulating oysters for more than 120 years. And the oyster population is at 1 percent of its historic levels.

The VMRC has devoted much to the last decade to trying to manage the blue crab harvest. But the crab population has fallen by more than two-thirds since the early 1990s. An expert panel assembled by the agency cites overfishing as a major reason — overfishing that hasn’t been stopped by regulations that are within the agency’s authority.”

The full article is here: http://www.dailypress.com/news/opinion/dp-ed_vmrc_edit_0214feb14,0,5645475.story